The Problem of the Too Perfect Hero

So I watched The Lucky One the other night.  First thing I noticed was that Zac Efron is growing up quite nicely.  The second thing was that his character, Logan, was perfect.  I mean, like really, REALLY perfect.  He’s incredibly good looking, he can fix the tractor no one else could get running, he plays piano, he reads philosophy, he’s good with kids and dogs.  In fact, about the only thing he can’t do is beat the heroine’s son at chess.  And come on – he plays chess!

In writing, there’s a term – Mary Sue.  A Mary-Sue is a character who is overly idealized.  She’s good, she’s kind and the she’s the bestest person who ever walked on the planet.

Logan in the Lucky One was a male Mary Sue.

Now, I haven’t read Nicholas Spark’s version of the story, so I’m going to assume the book had some deeper back story which gave Logan additional depth. But I don’t like perfect characters – even if they are pretty and have rock hard abs.  I prefer my characters to have some flaws, some humanity.  After all, no one in this world is perfect.  Think about some memorable characters – - Sebastian Ballister, Zsadist, Dean Winchester, Rick Castle —  we loved them because they were well-drawn, well-rounded characters with  both good and bad qualities.  They can be angry and short-sighted just as easily as they can rush in and save the day.

Unfortunately, too many writers make their heroes like Logan — too good to be true.  It’s as if they believe that to sell a fantasy lover, they have to make the hero fantastical.

So when working on your novel, resist the urge to make your hero too good.  Give him a flaw – a real flaw, not simply the inability to play chess – and let him be human.

 

Barb Wallace’s latest book features a hero who is good with his hands, and afraid of success.  You can read about Grant Templeton in Mr. Right, Next Door, available from Harlequin Romance.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Mega World News Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon Weekend Joy

About Barbara Wallace

Comments

  1. Amy Andrews says:

    I agree Barb. I have that on a permanent post-it note on my work surface. Give your hero a flaw and your bad guy a soft spot.
    Oh and that sex scene …… Ooh la la…..zac iz a man now!

    [Reply]

  2. robyn grady says:

    I must see the movie! I really like Zac. My husband thinks he’s just a pretty boy. He *is* pretty :)
    It’s a temptation to breeze over and forget about adding more human qualities to our characters. The trick is to still make them worth of our sympathy. I love when an author writes a horrible villain, who’s done rotten things, but still manages to make me like him.

    [Reply]

  3. Amy Andrews says:

    He ain’t no boy anymore, Robbie!

    [Reply]

  4. Excellent post and I totally agree. Gotta have those flaws in there :)

    [Reply]

  5. I think that’s one of the reasons I’ve never been crazy about romantic movies, Barb. The characters tend to come across as two-dimensional and sometimes not very heroic. My son watched a romance with me when he was 16 (because he’ll watch anything if it’s called a movie…). His comment? “Is it just me, or is this movie about two selfish people behaving badly?” LOL. Romances are really tough to get right.

    [Reply]

  6. Totally agree with you as well. I watched a few romantic movies in a fit of jetlagged braindeadness a week or so back and I agree with Paula. Or rather her son, just too many selfish people behaving badly for my liking. Interesting how they’re often adaptions of romantic novels but all the flaws so lovingly crafted by the author are flattened out. Not always, but too often for me.

    [Reply]

Speak Your Mind